Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              In a decision issued on 4 June 2024 I set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal to be remade.
              Mrs. Arif indicated that she had no cross-examination for the appellant, or for HW who had also attended the hearing. The hearing proceeded by way of submissions only which were translated for the appellant by the interpreter, Ms. R. Narula. She confirmed before proceeding that she and the appellant both fully understood each other. The language used was French.
              The agreed issues were whether the refusal was contrary to the Refugee Convention, whether it was a breach of Article 3 or Article 8 on medical grounds, and/or whether it was a breach of Article 8 on private life grounds. In relation to private life, it was submitted that the appellant met the requirements of paragraph 276ADE(1)(vi).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.