Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
            The Appellant is a national of Iraq, date of birth 1 January 1989, who on 27 January 2020 applied for asylum. The Respondent refused his application in a decision dated 16 April 2021 because the Respondent did not accept the Appellant's claim, he had been targeted because of his father's beliefs albeit it was accepted the Appellant's father had been killed because of his beliefs.
            The case was listed before Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Davies (hereinafter referred to as the FTTJ) on 4 May 2022 who subsequently dismissed the Appellant's appeal under the Refugee Convention and on human rights grounds,
            Permission to appeal was initially refused by the FTTJ. Permission to appeal was granted by Upper Tribunal Judge Perkins on 23 November 2022 because:
".... the Judge did not explain adequately what he made of evidence, which is identified painstakingly in the grounds supporting the application for permission from the First-tier Tribunal, that supported the Appellant's case. Judges do not have to comment on every strand of evidence and the Decision and Reasons may stand scrutiny but I am satisfied that it is arguable that it should not and I give permission on each ground."
            No Rule 24 response had been filed but Mr Diwnycz conceded the failures identified above amounted to an error in law.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.