Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant is the Secretary of State for the Home Department. The respondent is a citizen of Tanzania born on 8 June 1989. However for the sake of convenience, I shall refer to Miss TM as the appellant and the Secretary of State as the respondent which are the designations they had before the First-tier Tribunal.
The appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal against the decision of the respondent dated June 2013 which was refused with no right of appeal. The appellant then requested that a new decision to be issued and on 10 April 2014 her application was refused with an in country right of appeal. First Tier Tribunal Judge Widdup allowed the appellant�s appeal in a determination dated 19 February 2015.
The Judge made the following findings in his determination which in summary are the following.
I. [Paragraph 26] �I found both the appellant and her mother to be credible witnesses. Their accounts were largely consistent and they did not appear to be embellishing their evidence.
II. [Paragraph 27] �I will start by considering the submission that the appeal can succeed under paragraph 276 ADE (vi)�.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.