Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LORD JUSTICE LONGMORE THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LORD JUSTICE MCFARLANE and THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LORD JUSTICE LEWISON ____________________
Ms Jenni Richards QC & Mr J Auburn (instructed by Irwin Mitchell Solicitors) for the Appellant Ms Fenella Morris QC & Ms V Butler-Cole (instructed by Shropshire Council) for the Respondent Hearing dates: 20th & 21st March 2014 ____________________
It then set out 8 key elements of this vision in which the personalisation of budgets was given great emphasis (para 4.5). In para 5.3 it expected that there would be a reduction in numbers of people choosing residential care thus enabling the council to reduce cost, and provide better value for money. In relation to Day Time Opportunities it said (paras 5.5 and 7):-
It also promised consultation on a revised approach to charges for day centre places. Para 8.1 stated that the two proposals would form part of the strategy for achieving savings of about �9 million.
Cabinet was asked to note the consultation feedback, support the use of personalisation and personal budgets and approve the inclusion of day services in the fairer charging policy. It did so on 12 th September 2012.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.