Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Ms S Alvarez, of Counsel, instructed by Sediqi & Sediqi Solicitors
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              The appellant appeals the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge E M Field ('the judge') made after a hearing at Taylor House on 16 October 2023, in which the judge dismissed the appellant's appeal against the respondent's refusal of his protection and human rights claim.
              The grounds can be summarised thus. First, the judge erroneously required there to be cogent evidence supporting the appellant's case which, it is argued, belies an impermissible requirement for corroborative evidence when it has not been suggested it would be reasonable to provide such evidence and indicates the application of too high a standard of proof in protection claims.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.