Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
R (on the application of L) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (return of person removed: discretion) [2020] UKUT 267 (IAC)
For the Applicant:����� Mr A Briddock, Counsel, and Mr D Gr�tters, Counsel, instructed by the Camden Community Law Centre
For the Respondent:� Mr C Thomann, Counsel, instructed by the Government Legal Department
(1) A decision to remove a person (P) from the United Kingdom under immigration powers will not be unlawful by reason of the fact that it is predicated upon an earlier decision which has not, at the time of removal, been found to be unlawful, but which later is so found: AB v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 59 ; Niaz (NIAA 2002 s.104: pending appeal) [2019] UKUT 399 (IAC) .
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.