Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Hugh Jory QC (instructed by CLP Solicitors) for the Claimant Jonathan Miller (instructed by David Tagg & Co, solicitors) for the Defendants Hearing dates: 22, 23, 24, 25, 28 November and 2 December 2016 ____________________
(1) NTL had funds available to pay for such a large shipment because the first defendant had negotiated a financing deal for NTL with Andrey Komarov, a wealthy Russian businessman,
(2) Mr Komarov had agreed to provide funds to NTL specifically for the purpose of paying for the transaction with the claimant,
(3) Funds would come from Arkley, where the First Defendant had been a director since the late 1990s,
(5) Arkley was a subsidiary of Chelpipe, of which Mr Komarov was a major shareholder,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.