Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Employment Tribunal was wrong to refuse permission to the Respondent to rely on similar fact evidence in support of its contention that the Claimant mis-sold contracts and wrongly claimed commission on them. The effect of the evidence was that she had made dishonest commission claims in her previous and subsequently employment. The Employment Tribunal erred in:
"The Respondent relies on O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2005] 2 AC 534 and Desmond v Bower [2009] EWCA Civ 667 to show evidence of what had a person has done in the past and after the event is potentially relevant. In theory, I agree."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.