Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(ii) the documentary evidence before the judge was sufficient to establish that the Appellant was related as claimed,
Permission was granted on the sole ground that it was arguable that the First-tier tribunal judge had failed to adequately explain his conclusions about the relationship, which underpinned the decision that the Appellant had no right of appeal.
In short the decision of the judge dismissing Mr Abu Sayem�s appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and alternatively on the merits, reveals no material error of law requiring it to be set aside, and the decision dismissing the appeal stands.
The decision of the First-tier tribunal reveals no material error of law requiring it to be set aside, and it stands.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.