Skip to main content

Search Notes Common Room Case Library Flashcards Quizzes Past Papers SQE Tutors Leaderboard

Home›Case Library›ZSY v AAA

Tort

ZSY v AAA

[2023] EWHC KB 2977High Court (King's Bench)2023

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Tort cases →

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

Christopher Wilson-Smith KC and Ben Bradley (instructed by Barratts Solicitors, Nottingham) for the Claimant Simeon Maskrey KC (instructed by Weightmans) for the Defendant Hearing date: 13 November 2023 ____________________

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

Official
Read on National Archives
Official UK government case law repository
Mirror
Read on BAILII
British and Irish Legal Information Institute
Web
Find via Google
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately

More Tort cases

GQA Qualifications Ltd v Clayton

[2026] EWHC KB 114

[2026] EWHC 1095 (KB)

TWH Legal Services Limited T/A B&L Solicitors & Anor v Shanaz Niazi & Anor

[2026] EWHC 746 (KB)

Howard Beckett v Sharon Graham & Anor

[2026] EWHC 920 (KB)

Hamza Lakhany v Danyaal Hasan

[2026] EWHC 252 (KB)

Guest v Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

[2026] EWHC KB 704

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

Log in to comment. Discussions are part of the Common Room.

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.

caselaw

AI-generated briefs should be verified against the source judgment. This tool is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

[email protected]

StudyCase Library Browse A–Z Notes Flashcards Quizzes Past Papers Guides Blog Topics

ToolsAll tools OSCOLA Case Finder Glossary Court hierarchy LLB SQE1 Oxford BA

CaselawAbout How it works Pricing For universities For law firms FAQ Changelog Contact Press

TrustSecurity Accessibility Status Terms Privacy Acceptable use Refunds Sign up

Used by Oxford law students·Powered by Anthropic AI·Cases from The National Archives·Payments by Stripe·GDPR Compliant

SQE revision content is produced by Caselaw independently. Caselaw is not affiliated with the SRA, Kaplan, or any official SQE provider. Refunds · Terms

© 2026 caselaw. All rights reserved.