Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I must first decide if the decision of the Judge contained an error on a point of law so that it should be set aside.
The Judge dismissed the appeals solely on the basis that he was not satisfied that a reliable account had been given of the family�s financial circumstances in Pakistan as stated at paragraph 36 of the Determination.
At the hearing, I heard submissions by both parties. Mr Nasim argued that the Judge had erred in law by failing to consider all of the evidence. He referred to the grounds of application and submitted that the Judge had failed to deal with other relevant evidence such as the First Appellant�s employment, which was not disputed by the Entry Clearance Officer, and her children�s education.
The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal did involve the making of an error on a point of law.
The First-tier Tribunal did not make an order pursuant to Rule 45(4)(i) of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (Procedure) Rules 2005 and I find no reason to do so.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.