Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant is a national of Uganda and he applied for leave to remain as on the basis of his private and family life in the United Kingdom.
The respondent refused his application on April 23, 2014 and the appellant appealed against that decision under section 82(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 on May 1, 2014.
The matter was heard by Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Scott on May 12, 2015 and in a decision promulgated on June 2, 2015 the Tribunal refused his appeal under Immigration Rules and under ECHR.
The appellant applied for permission to appeal on June 16, 2015 submitting the Tribunal had erred by failing to find family life existed for the purposes of Article 8 ECHR and by failing to have full regard to Section 117B of the 2002 Act.
Permission to appeal was granted by Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Cruthers on August 17, 2015 on the basis the grounds were arguable albeit he indicated the appellant should not take the granting of permission of permission as an indication the appeal would succeed.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.