Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Unless and until a tribunal or court directs otherwise, the Appellant is granted anonymity. No report of these proceedings shall directly or indirectly identify him, any of his witnesses or any member of his family. This direction applies to, amongst others, both the Appellant and the Respondent. Failure to comply with this direction could lead to contempt of court proceedings
             The Appellant is a Pakistani national born in 1995. She appeals with permission against the decision of the First-Tier Tribunal (JG Raymond) to dismiss her appeal under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016.
             The matter in issue before Judge Raymond was whether the Appellant qualified for consideration for entry under Regulation 8. This provision, relating to extended family members, required her to prove that she was dependent for her essential living needs on her sponsor in the United Kingdom. Her sponsor, her cousin Touqeer Sharif, is a Spanish national with pre-settled status in the United Kingdom. Mr Sharif attended the hearing before me, and with the assistance of an Urdu interpreter, spoke on his cousin's behalf.
             The entry clearance officer was not satisfied that dependency had been established, and therefore refused to issue a family permit.
             The Appellant appealed, and on 5 September 2023 the matter came before Judge Raymond on the papers.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.