Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms Heather Williams (instructed by Hickman Rose) for the Claimant (1) Mr Philip Engelman (instructed by Hodge, Jones and Allen) for the Claimants (2) and (3) Mr Robin Tam (instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the Defendant Hearing dates : 11-13 March 2003 ____________________
HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT: APPROVED BY THE COURT FOR HANDING DOWN (SUBJECT TO EDITORIAL CORRECTIONS) ____________________
From this sum, a 20% deduction was made because of his criminal record. Lord Brennan thereby reduced the award to �220,000 , but that appears to be an arithmetical miscalculation which he should be invited to correct.
With the addition of an award of interest in respect of past pecuniary loss, this produced a pecuniary loss total of �770,000 which, when aggregated with the pecuniary loss of �220,000, gave a grand total of �990,000 , in respect of which interim payments of �170,000 had previously been made
Thus, the total award was �506,220.20 , in respect of which interim payments of �285,000 had previously been made.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.