Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
       The appellant appeals against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Juss promulgated on 04 March 2024 ("the decision"). By the decision, the Judge dismissed the appellant's appeal against the respondent's decision dated 03 May 2023, refusing his application to remain in the UK on human rights grounds.
       In summary, the grounds raised challenging the decision were that the Judge had made incorrect and inadequate findings.
       Permission to appeal was granted by Upper Tribunal Judge O'Brien on 01 August 2024, in the following terms:
"1. The appellant seeks permission in time to appeal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Juss, dismissing his appeal against the respondent's decision to refuse his human rights claim.
The grounds assert in essence that the judge was biased, gave inadequate reasons for findings against the appellant and a supporting witness, failed to attach correct weight to supporting evidence, failed to apply ss117B(2)&(3) in the appellant's favour, approached the issue of the appellant's grandmother irrationally, and so failed properly to assess proportionality.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.