Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
At some point between March 2000 and April 2001, the parties began cohabitation at the pursuer's then home at [address].
The parties' relationship of cohabitation ended in November 2007. They then occupied separately the house at [address] until March 2008.
There are two children of the relationship, being JF (born 11 th April 2002 ) and MF (born 5 th May 2006 ).
The first floor flat at [address] was a local authority tenancy of which the pursuer had been the tenant since 1989. In about July 2000 the pursuer obtained an offer from the local authority to sell to her the property at a price of �12,500 which was a discount from the then market value of �35,000. Had the purchase proceeded the secured loan which the pursuer would have taken was �15,000.
The pursuer did not proceed with the purchase. The pursuer's relationship with the defender was a factor in her decision not to proceed.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.