Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
TAX AND NATIONAL INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS - whether income was salary or bursary - whether in-time income tax repayment claim made - whether concession for Widening Access Training Scheme (�WATS�) courses applied - Tribunal jurisdiction in relation to concessions - appeal refused
For the Respondents: �� Ms Helen Davies, Litigator of HM Revenue and Customs� Solicitor�s Office
             Between 30 April 2012 and 22 March 2013, Mr Phelan attended a course (�the Course�) run by the University of Essex (�the University�).� On 12 March 2017, Mr Phelan wrote to HM Revenue & Customs (�HMRC�) seeking a repayment of the income tax and National Insurance Contributions (�NICs�) which had been deducted from his pay during the period he had attended the Course.�
             Mr Phelan�s position was that the money he had been paid was a bursary and therefore:
(1)           �exempt from tax under the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005 (�ITTOIA�), s 776, and from NICs under Sch 3, Part VII, para 12 of the National Insurance Contributions Regulations 2001 (�the NICs Regs�); and in any event
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.