Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber)���������������������� Appeal Number: RP/00104/2016
For the Respondent:����� Ms V Easty, Counsel, instructed by Duncan Lewis & Co Solicitors
Pursuant to Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 (SI 2008/269) I continue the anonymity order made by the First-tier Tribunal. Unless the Upper Tribunal or a Court directs otherwise, no report of these proceedings or any form of publication thereof shall directly or indirectly identify the original appellant. This direction applies to, amongst others, all parties. Any failure to comply with this direction could give rise to contempt of court proceedings.
This decision is a remaking of the appeal of MS brought against the respondent�s decisions of 4 and 10 August 2016 to revoke his refugee status and to refuse his Article 3 and Article 8 ECHR human rights claim.
For the purposes of this decision, I shall refer to the Secretary of State for the Home Department as the respondent and to MS as the appellant, reflecting their positions before the First-tier Tribunal.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.