Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
In this appeal I shall refer to the parties as the Secretary of State who is the appellant and to the claimants.
This matter comes before me for consideration as to whether or not there is a material error of law in the determination. The appellant is the Secretary of State for the Home Department and the claimants are husband, wife and daughter, all of whom are citizens of India and whose dates of birth are 1 January 1948, 26 October 1951 and 24 September 1977. The sponsors are the sons/brothers of the claimants and are resident in the UK and British citizens.
The Secretary of State has appealed a decision before the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Stanford) promulgated on 24 May 2014 in which he allowed the appeals under the Immigration Rules granting entry clearance as adult dependent relatives (Appendix FM � paragraph EC-DR.1.1) and on human rights grounds.
The reasons for refusal dated 26 April 2013 issued in respect of all three claimants were that:
(1) They had travelled extensively to other countries and last visited in September 2012. This was inconsistent with their claimed level of disability.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.