Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
      The appellant is a national of India, born in 1981. He appeals with the permission of the Upper Tribunal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal dated 10 June 2021 to dismiss his human rights appeal.
      The appellant appealed that decision to the First-tier Tribunal. He claimed that the respondent's decision improperly interfered with his rights to a private and family life. He had been in the UK for over 13 years by the time the First-tier Tribunal (FtT) determined the appeal, and he had been in a relationship with his wife since March 2019. They married in February 2020. The main issue between the respondent and appellant in the First-tier Tribunal was the question of insurmountable obstacles on return.
      In a reasoned decision promulgated on the 10 June 2021 the FtT dismissed the appeal.
      The appellant advanced three grounds of appeal at the permission stage which we paraphrase here:
a.       That the FtT failed properly to assess whether the 'insurmountable obstacles' test was met and did not make the necessary factual enquiry into the circumstances of the appellant and his wife;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.