Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
                  At the outset it is appropriate for this Tribunal to observe that the First-tier Tribunal decision is well-structured and clearly prepared with considerable diligence. The grounds of appeal prepared by Ms Solanki, Counsel, proved to be of real aid to this Tribunal. The short, clear submissions of both Ms Francis and Mr Tan were on point, and exemplary.
                  The appellant appeals with permission a decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Woolley sent to the parties on 10 July 2023. The underlying challenge by the appellant before the First-tier Tribunal is to the refusal of an entry clearance application under the Immigration Rules concerned with adult dependant relative. The appeal is brought on human rights (article 8 ECHR) grounds.
                  The appellant is a national of Syria and is presently aged 67. By a decision dated 24 November 2022 the respondent decided in respect of Section EC-DR:
You do not meet the requirements of E-ECDR.2.4 & E-ECDR.2.5 for the following reasons:
In support of your application you have provided medical letters from Dr Yanal Saaid and Dr Abdulrahman Alselo of the Syrian Physicians Syndicate. These letters state that you suffer from depression, insomnia, panic attacks and osteoarthritis. While this has been taken into account I am not satisfied it confirms that you require long term personal care to perform everyday tasks. Therefore you do not meet the requirements of E-ECDR.2.4.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.