Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber)�������������������������������������� Appeal Number: I A/02031/2013
10.��� Samuel went on to say that he had not seen the mother of his children for seven months.� The two children were living with him at Coachmaker Court, where Frank also lived with his wife and four children.� He denied Mr Wilding�s suggestion that he was not living there at all, but was still living at Forest Rise.� I was shown Samuel�s driving licence, which gives his address as Coachmaker Court.
13.��� In her closing submissions, Miss Okyere-Darko contended valiantly that despite the discrepancy highlighted by Mr Wilding, there was enough evidence to establish that Samuel himself was living at Coachmaker Court, and hence was the extended family member of an EEA national who was exercising �Treaty rights�.
15.��� The upshot is that Samuel Anning is neither a dependant nor a member of the household of an EEA national who is a �qualified person� in terms of the EEA Regulations 2006, and hence he is not entitled to a residence card.
��������� The order for anonymity made by the First-tier Tribunal was wholly inappropriate for a case of this sort, and is not maintained.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.