Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
      The Appellant is a national of Pakistan born in 1990. He appeals with permission against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Alis) to dismiss his protection appeal.
      The only matter in issue before the First-tier Tribunal was a question of fact. Is it reasonably likely that the Appellant is gay?
      The only question before me is whether, in reaching its conclusion that he is not, the First-tier Tribunal erred in law.
      The Appellant entered the United Kingdom in 2010, in possession of a Tier 4 (General) Student Migrant visa. On the 16th January 2019 he was apprehended and served with papers notifying him that he was an overstayer. He then claimed asylum. The basis of his claim was that as a gay man he faces a real risk of persecution in Pakistan for reasons of his membership of a particular social group.
      By her letter of the 4th January 2021 the Secretary of State rejected the claim. She did not accept that the Appellant is gay.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.