Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
LADY JUSTICE ARDEN LORD JUSTICE BEATSON and LORD JUSTICE HENDERSON ____________________
Mr Arfan Khan and Mr Tiki Emezie (Solicitor/Advocate) (instructed by Dylan Conrad Kroelle Solicitors ) for the Appellant Mr James Chegwidden (instructed by Government Legal Department) for the Respondent Hearing dates : 8 November 2016 ____________________
In this case the material provision is section 17(4)(b). Section 17(6) provides that:
Section 17(4) of the 2006 Act was amended by the Immigration Act 2014, but the amendments do not affect this appeal because the civil penalty in this case was imposed before 28 July 2014.
He concluded (at 356) that �"if the act to be done by the person is one for which some action by the court is requisite, such as issuing a writ, and it is impossible to do that act on the last day of the period because the office of the court is closed for the whole of that day, the period must be construed as ending not on that day but at the expiration of the next day upon which the offices of the court are open and it becomes possible to do the act.�"
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.