Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Before the Lord Chancellor (Herschell) , and Lords Watson , Shand , and Ashbourne .)
[Heard and decided along with The London Street Tramways Co. v. The London County Council .]
The Edinburgh Local Authority gave notice under the foregoing section to purchase the Edinburgh Street Tramways undertaking.
The present conjoined actions were thereupon raised by the appellants against the respondents for the purpose of reducing Mr Tennant's award or decree-arbitral, upon the ground that his view of section 43 of the Tramways Act 1870 was erroneous, and for declarator that he ought, under that section, to have fixed the value to be paid by the respondents for the tramways Page: 954 ↓
Both the Lord Ordinary and the First Division of the Inner House have held Mr Tennant's award to be good, and have assoilzied the respondents.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.