Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The anonymity directions are continued. Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant and any member of her family are granted anonymity. This is because the subject matter of this appeal includes a protection claim. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name and address of the appellant or her family, likely to lead members of the public to identify them. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              The appellant's appeal on the basis that she is a refugee has previously been refused and there was no outstanding appeal on that basis. However, the appellant's appeal based on humanitarian protection, and Articles 3 and 8 of the ECHR succeeds and the respondent's decision is not upheld.
              The anonymity directions will continue to apply.
A black and white emblem with lions and unicorns AI-generated content may be incorrect.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant and any member of her family is granted anonymity. This is because the subject matter of this appeal is a protection claim. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant or her family, likely to lead members of the public to identify them. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.