Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              In this case the Appellant is the Secretary of State for the Home Department represented by Mr C Avery, a Senior Home Office Presenting Officer. The Respondent, "AH" is represented by Ms M Vidal of Counsel, instructed by Haris Ali Solicitors. For ease of reference I shall continue to refer to the parties as they were in the First-tier Tribunal and I shall also refer to AH as the Appellant/Claimant within this decision.
              This is my oral decision which I delivered at the hearing today.
              An anonymity direction has previously been made. That continue because this matter relates to a protection claim, and as I have indicated previously, the parties have permission to apply to discharge the anonymity order with reasons.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.