Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 14 December 2004 Handed down on 11 February 2005 Before
Applicant resigned ahead of disciplinary hearing. He asserted constructive dismissal. Employment Tribunal held he resigned in expectation of good reference enabling him to take another job. On appeal he contended (1) The Employment Tribunal had failed to look at the overall picture of the employer's conduct towards him. (2) Certain findings of fact were perverse. (3) The Employment Tribunal erred in law in concluding the employer's conduct was not causative of his resignation.
Held (1) The Employment Tribunal had looked at the overall picture. (2) The findings of fact were not perverse. (3) The Employment Tribunal made findings of fact as to the cause of his resignation.
The Tribunal was reminding itself that it had to look cumulatively at the treatment of which the Applicant complained. It also recorded, as part of the submissions made on behalf of the Applicant, that "the above matters [ie the matters of which complaint were made], taken in the round, constituted a breach of the duty of mutual trust and confidence". It did not however, having addressed the individual complaints, say at the conclusion of its reasons in its original decision that it had also considered the complaints cumulatively.
Similarly at paragraph 30 it made clear that it was looking at the totality of the matters in issue when it wrote
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.