Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
In this determination I will refer to the parties by the style in which they appeared before the First-Tier Tribunal.
The appellant is a male citizen of Pakistan born 12 July 1990. He made application for entry clearance to join his wife in the United Kingdom. His wife has leave to remain as a domestic worker. The application was refused and he appealed that decision. His appeal came before Judge of the First-Tier Tribunal Hussain sitting at Richmond on 15 April 2014. The appellant�s sponsor attended and gave evidence. The respondent was represented by a Presenting Officer. In a determination promulgated on 29 May 2014 the appellant�s appeal was allowed.
The respondent sought leave to appeal that decision. The grounds allege a material error in that the judge had failed to deal with an issue that had been specifically raised in the decision notice. This included comment that no evidence had been provided regarding contact for 2� years between the parties to the marriage.
In granting leave to appeal another judge of the First-Tier Tribunal gave this as a reason:
�It is arguable that the judge erred in failing address (sic) the sponsor�s failure to visit the appellant for some two and half years before the making of the application. This was raised in the decision as a reason for the refusal�.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.