Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The claimant was represented by Mr M Potter, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by Thompsons McClure, Solicitors.
The respondent was represented by Mr J O'Hara, Queen's Counsel, instructed by Jones & Cassidy, Solicitors.
Indeed, if in an appropriate case, a respondent is required by the Tribunal to respond to a claimant's witness�statement, with the consequences referred to by Mr�O'Hara in this case, this requirement must outweigh any issue of expedition in order to ensure fairness.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.