Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 19 June 2000 Before
It appears that the Employment Tribunal heard the evidence of the Respondents first because they knew what the Appellant's case was and wanted to hear the Respondent's answer to it and no doubt, with an un-represented party, it was of assistance to him as well to know in advance what was going to be said.
The Employment Tribunal then sets out a passage, which is criticised by Mr Burgher, as follows:
It is suggested that those demonstrate inconsistencies in the evidence, for in the decision of the Employment Tribunal, they record her evidence as being that she had never made any remarks about colour or Irish nationality.
In another more detailed document, Mr Azariah said that Mr Brandt appeared to be half-asleep. This went before the Chairman, Mr Flint, for him to give his response and in a letter dated 7 January 2000, the response came that in. In relation to the affidavit of Mr Azariah:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.