Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
�The appellant maintains that the entry clearance Officer�s decision to refuse her leave to enter into the UK is against her human rights, in particular her rights under the Art 8 of the ECHR.
The appellant says she has an established family life with her father Mr Adjei who is her sponsor.
The appellant also says she has formed family life with her step mother and siblings in the UK.
The appellant says that the ECO�s decision to refuse her case is disproportionate interference to her right to family life. The appellant says that it is cheaper for her to visit her family in the UK to maintain the family life they have established than for the family to visit her in Ghana.�
�On the evidence before this Tribunal I find no basis to conclude that she would seek employment in the UK or that she would not return at the end of the visit.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.