Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Robert Fookes (instructed by Prospect Law Ltd) for the Claimant David Forsdick QC (instructed by East Hampshire District Council Legal Services Department) for the First Defendant The Second Defendant did not appear and was not represented The First Interested Party did not appear and was not represented The Second Interested Party appeared in person Hearing dates: 23rd & 24th October 2014 ____________________
i) there is a time in the recent past when an actual use of the building furthered the social wellbeing or interests of the local community, and
ii) it is realistic to think that there is a time in the next five years when there could be non-ancillary use of the building that would further the social wellbeing or social interests of the local community.
i) The boundary at the shortest distance is about 36 metres. 45.72 metres is the English Cricket Board recommended minimum boundary distance.
ii) Cricket balls commonly travel in excess of 70 metres, at all levels and abilities.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.