Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is her appeal against the determination of First-tier Tribunal Judge Manuel, who dismissed her appeal against the decision of the respondent to refuse entry clearance to the United Kingdom for family reunion pursuant to paragraph 352D of the Immigration Rules. The Judge heard the appeal on 29.1.14.
In granting permission to appeal, Judge Macdonald noted that the judge found in favour of the appellant in relation to paragraph 352D(iii) �and it is arguable, for reasons given on the grounds, that the judge did not give adequate reasons for dismissing the appeal under paragraph 352D(iv). Permission is granted on both grounds.�
For the reasons set out herein, I find no material error of law in the determination of the First-tier Tribunal such that it requires the decision to be set aside and remade.
There is no challenge that the appellant is the child of the sponsor, nor that she is under the age of 18. It is also accepted that Mr Kuli has been granted refugee status in the UK before the application was made.
352D(iii) requires that the appellant is not leading an independent life, is unmarried and has not formed an independent family unit.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.