Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The 2001 scheme was made under the authority of section 1 of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act 1995. It is the relevant scheme for the purposes of the present case. The relevant paragraphs of the scheme provide as follows:
(a) to an applicant who has sustained a criminal injury on or after 1 st � August 1964 �
For the purposes of this Scheme �applicant means any person for whose benefit an application for compensation is made, even where it is made on his behalf by another person
Paragraph 8 . For the purposes of this Scheme �criminal injury� means one or more personal injuries as described in the following paragraphs �and directly attributable to:
The parties are agreed that in the present case JT�s injuries came within the scheme and were attributable to the actions of the dog.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.