Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellants are citizens of Pakistan born on 10 January 1976 and 15 June 1996 respectively. The second appellant is the child of the first appellant. The appeals have therefore been linked and heard together. Both appellants are seeking to join the first appellant's husband, Mr Mohammed Hassan Khan ("the sponsor"), in the UK for settlement. The sponsor is the father of the second appellant, who was under 18 at the date of application.
The issues in these appeals are well summarized in the decision of the First-tier Tribunal granting the appellants permission to appeal:
"1. In a Decision promulgated on 3 September 2015 Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Hussain dismissed the Appellants' appeals against the Respondent's decisions to refuse them entry clearance for settlement in the UK with their husband/father.
The issue in the appeal was whether the Appellants had produced the evidence required by Appendix FM-SE relating to the Sponsor's income, specifically whether the bank statements covering the same period as the tax return had been produced.
The Respondent assessed the evidence with reference to the Sponsor's claimed income of £22,798. That is the income shown on his tax calculations for the year 2013/14. The Respondent found that the bank statements produced did not cover that entire year.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.