Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Mr Humza Malik, Counsel instructed by Indra Sebastian Solicitors
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
            The appellant has been granted permission to appeal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Suffield-Thompson promulgated on 11 October 2023 ("the Decision"). By the Decision, Judge Suffield-Thompson dismissed the appellant's appeal against the refusal of her fresh protection claim.
            The appellant is a national of Sri Lanka, who came to the UK as a student and later on claimed asylum on 25 September 2017. When she was asked to explain in outline her reasons for her claim, she said in her screening interview that she received threats from her ex-boyfriend because she had separated from him. They had started since 2009. He warned her that if she went back to Sri Lanka she would be killed. Both of her parents had been threatened by him.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.