Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant and any member of her family is granted anonymity because this is a protection appeal.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant or any member of her family. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 40(3)(a) OF THE TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE (UPPER TRIBUNAL) RULES 2008
             The appellant is a citizen of Zimbabwe. She appealed to the First-tier Tribunal ("FtT") against the respondent's decision to refuse a protection and human rights claim. The FtT dismissed the appellant's appeal.
             In summary, the grounds contend that the FtT erred in law in the assessment of the expert medical evidence, and including the FtT's approach to the GP's records, in its consideration of the appellant's vulnerability in relation to the assessment of credibility, took an erroneous approach to credibility generally, and failed adequately to consider background evidence on the availability of treatment in Zimbabwe. The rule 24 response accepts an interrelationship between various of the arguments advanced in the grounds.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.