Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              The appellant is a citizen of Pakistan. He appeals against the decision of the respondent on 9 December 2021 refusing him leave to remain in the United Kingdom on human rights grounds. The appeal was previously dealt with unsatisfactorily in the First-tier Tribunal. I found the First-tier Tribunal had erred in law and I set aside the decision.
              The appellant relies on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. It is for him to prove on the balance of probabilities the facts necessary to establish his case and for the respondent to justify any interference in his private and family life.
              Mr Nazim made clear that the appellant did not rely on Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
              This rather late decision is based very closely on a draft that I received from the typist on 23 October 2023. I am sorry that I have not promulgated it sooner than I have.
              The papers show that the appellant was born in April 1979 and so is now 45 years old. It is the appellant's case that he entered the United Kingdom without permission on 3 November 2004 and applied for leave to remain on human rights grounds on 16 December 2020 but his claim was not accepted until 13 January 2021.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.