Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
David Wolfe (instructed by John Ford) for the Claimant Nicholas Armstrong (instructed by Legal Services, London Borough of Waltham Forest) for the Defendant Sam Grodzinski (instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State for the Department for Children, Schools and Families The other Interested Parties were neither represented not present at the hearing. Hearing date: 11 February 2009 Further written submission received on 13 February 2009 ____________________
IV Was the hearing before the panel " the determination of [V's] civil rights and obligations " so as to engage Article 6 of the ECHR?
V Was the Panel concerned with "the determination� of any criminal charge against [V] " so as to engage Article 6 of the ECHR ?
VI What standard of proof applies if the proceedings constituted the determination of a criminal charge?
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.