Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant, Krushnakant Akjanbhai Vinzuda, date of birth 31.5.87, is a citizen of India.
This is his appeal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge McMahon promulgated 18.11.14, dismissing his appeal against the decisions of the respondent, dated 26.10.12, to refuse his application made on 18.7.12 for leave to remain as a Tier 4 (General) Student Migrant under the Points Based System (PBS) of the Immigration Rules, and to remove him from the UK pursuant to section 47 of the Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2006. The Judge heard the appeal on 28.10.14.
For the reasons set out herein, I find that there was no material error of law in the making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal such as to required the determination of Judge McMahon to be set aside.
There is a convoluted history to this appeal which can be summarised as follows:
(b) 12.1.11: Granted leave to enter the UK as a Tier 4 (General) Student, expiring 27.5.12;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.