Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Mr M Iqbal, of Counsel, instructed by BS Solicitors/Briton Solicitors
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             Permission to appeal was granted following an application by the Secretary of State and an Upper Tribunal Panel found that the First-tier Tribunal had erred in law for the reasons set out in the decision, which is appended to this decision as Annex A.
             The matter came before us to remake the appeal. As set out in the decision on error of law, the judge's findings of fact and the decision that the appellant succeeded in his appeal on Article 3 ECHR grounds were preserved. The only matter therefore to be remade is whether or not the appellant is excluded from protection under the Refugee Convention and from Humanitarian Protection by application of s.72 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.