Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant is a citizen of Iran. On April 12, 2014 the appellant applied for leave to remain as a Tier One (Entrepreneur) Migrant. The respondent refused the application on May 8, 2014 finding that mandatory documents had not been submitted. A decision to remove him was also taken under section 47 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006.
The appellant appealed that decision on May 22, 2014 under section 82(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. He argued the documents had been submitted and removal would also breach his right to private life.
The matter came before Judge of the First-tier Tribunal McMahon on January 27, 2015 and in a decision promulgated on February 10, 2015 the Tribunal upheld the refusal and dismissed the appellant's appeal under both the Immigration Rules and article 8 ECHR.
The appellant applied for permission to appeal on February 18, 2015 submitting the Tribunal had erred. Permission to appeal was initially refused by Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Heynes on April 9, 2015 but following renewed grounds Upper Tribunal Judge Eshun granted permission to appeal on the grounds it was arguable the Tribunal had erred.
The First-tier Tribunal did not make an anonymity direction and pursuant to Rule 14 of The Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 I see no reason to make an order now.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.