Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
����������������������������������������������� instructed by Blakemores Solicitors
For the second claimant:��� Mr C Jacobs, Counsel instructed by Howe & Co, Solicitors
For the Respondent:����������� Mr A Payne, Counsel instructed by the Treasury Solicitor
The Court of Appeal decided in the present case that a failure by a party to comply with the provisions of the Procedure Rules is an �error of procedure� within the meaning of rule 59, and that rule therefore operates to preserve the validity of steps taken in the proceedings thereafter, unless the Tribunal exercises the discretion therein to order to the contrary.
The power may be exercised even when the point has not been raised by the appellant.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.