Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Judicial Review of a Decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to detain the petitioner
[1] In this Judicial Review the petitioner sought reduction of the Secretary of State for the Home Department's (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent") decisions to detain the petitioner in terms of schedule 3 of the Immigration Act 1971 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") from 20 December 2008 to the date of the hearing (hereinafter referred to as "the challenged decisions").
The factual background to the petitioner's detention [2] The factual background was not generally in dispute and I was able to make the following findings from the pleadings; the productions; the statements made by counsel during the course of submissions and a chronology of events which was lodged by counsel for the respondent at the outset of the hearing and which I understood not to be in dispute in so far as it set out dates on which certain events had occurred.
[4] The following events material to the discussion before me have occurred between 16 December 2005 and 28 October 2009 :
07/02/06 ETD application received by RGDU. An ETD is a travel document required for the petitioner to enter South Africa
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.