Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Appeals are brought against the decisions by the respondent to refuse to issue a registration certificate to the principal appellant and residence cards to the second appellant, his wife, and the third, fourth and fifth appellants, the children. The first appellant is a national of Portugal born on 21 st August 1982. The second appellant is a national of Brazil and the third, fourth and fifth appellants are also nationals of Brazil.
It is not in dispute that the second, third, fourth and fifth appellants are dependants upon the first appellant�s claim and are family members of an EEA national.
The central issue being whether or not he is exercising treaty rights in the United Kingdom so as to entitle him and his family members to the residence certificates as requested.
The appeal came before First-tier Tribunal Judge Kimnell on 14 th January 2014. The appeal was determined without a hearing upon the papers. A large bundle of documents were submitted under cover of a letter of 2 nd October 2013 from London Help 4U.
The Judge sets out a number of those documents in the course of the decision in particular paragraph 8 as follows:-
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.