Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
At a hearing on 14 February 2017 I found that there was a material error of law in the decision of the First-tier Tribunal for the following reasons which are recorded at paragraphs 12 and 13 of the decision:
"There was no evidence before the First-tier Tribunal that the letter curtailing the Appellant's leave had been signed for and consequently the finding that the notice curtailing his leave was communicated and the Appellant was without leave when he made his application was an error of law.
I set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal and adjourned with directions for the remaking of the decision in the appeal.
Mr Singh accepted that it appeared from the Appellant's bundle that he met the financial requirements of the Rules. However, if the documentation did not meet the rules there were no insurmountable obstacles to return and nothing to suggest that there was no support from families in Bangladesh.
The First-tier Tribunal found that the Appellant met the requirements of Appendix O in relation to the English Language requirement of the Rules (E-LTRP.4.1) and that finding stands.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.