Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 16 March 2006 Before
Unfair dismissal � first claim had been held to be premature � second claim out of time, but ET found not reasonably practicable to have presented it in time. Employer's appeal dismissed.
Costs of "misconceived" appeal awarded � relevance of threat to claim costs made in ET 3.
The Pre-Hearing Review came before Mr Christopher Jeans QC, sitting alone, on 5 April 2005. It will be observed that if the Claimant had been dismissed on Christmas Eve 2004, the time that had elapsed since that date was some 3� months. Mr Jeans' decision was that the complaints of unfair dismissal, breach of contract and failure to provide written reasons failed and were dismissed.
The Extension of Jurisdiction Order of 1994 conferring contractual jurisdiction on the Tribunal has an effectively identical provision in Article 7.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.