Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 20 January 1997 Before
The background is that the applicant commenced employment with the Company in 1981 as a junior clerk in its Warehouse Administration Department at Aylesford in Kent. The Company's head office, including its Sales and Accounts Departments, was in Peckham, South London. The Company's business is that of importing and distributing ethnic food.
In 1991 the applicant took maternity leave, and upon her return to work was appointed senior clerk. Below her were two junior clerks, Miss Vinden and Miss Wyatt.
In December 1994 the Board decided that the Head Office function should be moved from Peckham to Aylesford in order to save costs. To avoid duplication of work, redundancies were envisaged.
In May 1995 it was decided that two post in the Aylesford Warehouse Administration Department would be made redundant, those of senior clerk (the applicant's post) and one of the junior clerk positions.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.