Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The respondent obtained permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal promulgated on 25 August 2015 allowing the appeal of the appellant on a limited basis. The First-tier Tribunal remitted the case to the Secretary of State so that the immigration history of the appellant can be clarified; and a further decision can be made, against which further appeal rights will lie.
I consented to the withdrawal of the Secretary of State's decision, which in turn led to the withdrawal of the appellant's case.
On agreement, the appellant will submit to the Secretary of State an application for leave to remain on the right form (SET(LR)) and pay the appropriate fee within 28 days of this Notice.
Accordingly, with my consent, and pursuant to rule 17(5) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, this appeal is recorded as "withdrawn with the consent of the Upper Tribunal". The effective of this is that the proceedings before the Upper Tribunal are at an end.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.